We have listed the most popular frameworks you can use for your future projects below, along with their pros and cons for better understanding.
- React JS
React.js development is most ideal when a superior performing enterprise app is required to be delivered to its user-base. User interfaces like Instagram and Facebook empower it.
● Virtual Document Object Model (DOM)
● One-way data-binding only
● Made up of various elements that can be reused
● Cross-platform performance
● very simple to learn and use
● It comes with a set of efficient tools
● Helps with performance enhancement
● Smaller in size
● Ability to test and debug quickly
● Regular upgrades need developers to sustain recent learning changes
● It is not a comprehensive technology. It needs to be used with other F/Ms.
- Vue JS
Vue.js offers a simple and swift fix for apps, user interface, and engaging web-based interface development. It can empower modern-day single-page web-based apps.
● Cost-effective virtual DOM view option
● It comes with a built-in component that helps with CSS transitions and animations
● Precise two-way data binding preferences
● Easy to understand and learn
● Simple to integrate
● Small in size
● Offers two-way communication
● Flexible framework
● Lack of essential plugins
● Not suitable for extensive scaling
● Has language barriers
● Too flexible for good
It is one of the most powerful and best JS Frameworks in 2023. Here are the top characteristics of Angular.
It enables transmission of all the contents right from the server to the precise browser and helps in arranging all the created web pages concurrently.
Angular has a precise NativeScript for native applications while facilitating an Ionic framework for hybrid-based apps. AngularJS is a cross-platform framework. The code of the framework is entirely clean, easy to comprehend and comprises very less frequency of errors through its precise controller and data rendering technique.
● Ability to offer high-performance, progressive web-pages
● Can work across multiple operating systems
● It provides an instinctive and progressive API
● Aptitude to get smart code at the ends
● Provides immediate error discovery and feedback selections
● Flawless synchronization amid view and model
● Alterations are promptly showcased right in the view
● Capability to isolate out the view and data sets
● More complex F/M to learn
● The developer needs to learn MVC
● Heavier framework
- Ember JS
Ember has a precise widget-based style, known as Ember components. It possesses the handlebars layout and its architecture enables developers to own the application-based HTML tags.
● Large teams can easily use it
● It comes with computed properties
● It has larger than 1500 add-ons that only have to grow with time
● Reusable and easy to maintain too
● Seamless URL support
● Offers client-rendering services
● Well-blended data layers
● Minimizes DOM
● Slightly more complicated to learn
● Very opinionated
● Not very fast and efficient
It is intended to create network-based applications on a large scale; to achieve this; Node is optimized for efficient management of resources. It is also compatible with other libraries, frameworks.
● All APIs in the Node.js library work asynchronously, which means they are non-blocking. After calling an API, the server will move to the next one. An Event notification mechanism of Node.js allows the server to receive a response from the previous API call.
● Node.js has a single-threaded model that uses event looping. The server responds in a non-blocking manner using the event mechanism. This contrasts with traditional servers with limited threads for handling requests.
● Node.js apps never buffer data. These applications output data in chunks.
● Easy to use and easily integrated with other applications.
● Capability to increase the scale by the requirements
● Non-blocking and non-blocking thread execution
● Support for handling a variety of concurrent connections
● Rapid processing and an event-based model
● Performance is a concern when you use a lot of computation.
● A decrepit tooling system is a significant issue
● Call-backs are a constant necessity that can affect the quality of code
● Library support is not as strong.
● This API is susceptible to several changes due to the unstable API
- Svelte JS
It runs at build time and converts your components into code that runs in the browsers, whereas others do the operations in the browser itself.
● No virtual DOM
● Very reactive
● Lightweight and easy to implement
● Lesser boilerplate
● Very easy to learn
● It comes with a built-in reactive store
● Not an extremely recognized framework
● There is continuous requirement to explore and update
● Not many such tools in the market
● Smaller-sized community and ecosystem
Many developers utilize React to develop and then change to Preact when they are in production. With its strong community support, speedy performance, and clean code Preact JS has made a name for itself within the community.
● It’s among the fastest Virtual DOM libraries out there due to its simple and consistent diff implementation. These allow you to share reusable objects, including buttons, to data providers.
● Preact’s design lets you effortlessly use the hundreds of components available within the React ecosystem.
● Preact can be automatically updated in batches and tuned to its maximum performance.
● Extraordinarily light and quick framework
● The efficiency is superior to React
● High-end compatibility
● A powerful command-line interface
● The presence of a link-state module
● A tiny community of programmers, compared to React
● Only allows stateless components
● It doesn’t have propTypes support, which is a crucial characteristic of React
● Possibility of Typescript Conflicts
● A large and complex codebase
● Open-source library comprising 100+useful extensions
● It turns the coding straightforward and highly organized
● Enable client-side web and mobile apps with precise formats
● Enables own development and architecture decision-makings
● Mix and match elements best for your application requirements
● Possess immense community and massive ecosystem for support
● Poor levels of user experience for big-sized data structures
● Backing diverse URI scheme can be tough to deal
● The lack of a precise and explicit controller building block
In addition, Google has designed Polymer to utilize existing web components to create any kind of web-based application, making this one of the USPs of this library.
● Form inputs are a great place to use custom elements.
● A lightweight library designed to allow you to take full advantage of Web Components.
● You can import components and use them without the need to build.
● Polymer lets you declare properties and integrate your element’s property API with the Polymer database system.
● Polymer offers a declarative syntax to attach event listeners and shadow DOM children to events.
● It lets you create your components
● Allows you to create premium UX
● No chance of garbage CSS
● Support for one-way and two-way data binding
● Responsive design using app layout components
● The component must be designed for each browser.
● Poor performance on mobile devices
● Inadequate or unclear error reporting
● Many issues are connected to dependencies on libraries.
- Next JS
● Automatic routing
● Server rendering
● It responds well with other ecosystems, including React framework and Angular
● Automatically prefetches pages
● Adaptable and responsive JS
● Helps meet sales and traffic goals
● Offers unique user experience
● Has built-in CSS support
● Needs minimal or no initial configuration
● It becomes expensive to customize
● Minimal number of plugins only
● It needs time to build and manage the framework
● Aurelia allows you to create engaging, rich experiences for customers that exceed native application standards.
● Allows you to create custom HTML elements and add custom attributes to existing HTML elements.
● Multi-tool support, set of plugins, and dynamic UI composition.
● Components are highly adaptable and can easily adjust or drop out to fit your requirements.
● Constructive conventions make it simple
● Modern architecture
● It is possible to extend
● It integrates well with other components
● It is simple to use
● Dependency Injection
● Aurelia focused on web standards without unnecessary abstractions.
● Aurelia is extensible.
- Express JS
Express JS is an application framework that is used for Node JS. It is a ready-to-use resolution for creating web apps and pages very speedily.
One of the key benefits of using the Express JS framework is fast server-side coding. Your developers can complete complex tasks in just a few minutes. It also takes care of dynamic URLS with its active routing mechanism.
● Works as a middleware
● It helps reduce web app building time by half
● Even beginners can use it
● Very easy to learn and implement
● Unable to manage heavyweight computational jobs
● It possesses an unbalanced API
● Generates the requirement for numerous code alterations
MeteorJS is useful in developing applications through a do-it-all framework. It assists in creating production web and mobile applications and is utilized by leading organizations like Ikea and Workpop.
It is a highly effective tool for a beginner exploring the wide scope of application development and helps in the procedure of developing a straightforward app.
● Provides a full-stack solution for building and deploying web-based applications
● Enables developing dynamic and real-time applications from beginning
● Use same code for web as well as mobile-based applications in diverse projects
● Large community offers the framework superior flexibility and endurance
● Cross-platform and enable app implementations in one single place
● The precise direction of its development meticulously follows its user-base
● If programmers put added dependence on pre-built packages – they struggle
● If you are merely making a webapp, it might be easier to utilize Express
● Difficult to develop a mobile web-app operate as proficient as with native
- Gatsby JS
Gatsby JS is an open-source front-end framework perfect for creating dynamic and exact websites that function seamlessly. Through Gatsby, its user-base can receive information and insights from any of the data set sources.
Rather of being an SSR, this particular framework communicates content on the client-side right in the build time. This assists in delivering matchless security and SEO results on a long-term basis.
● Competence to syndicate data from several sources
● Works seamlessly with various Content Delivery Networks (CDN)
● Easy and cost-effective scalability
● non-existent attack surface
● Very accessible
● The constant need to update content
● It can be expensive to implement and manage
Mithril includes every feature other frameworks offer, such as DOM Elements Components, Routing and the XHR.
The XHR is simply a method to connect with the server. Communication is the key to moving forward. Mithril.js is utilized by major companies such as Vimeo and Nike and open-source platforms such as Lichess.
● It is effortless to use, but it has lots of documentation.
● It’s tiny, quick and comes with routing and XHR tools.
● Mithril’s goal is to help developers become better by making good practices simple and bad practices difficult.
● Performance excellence
● Good templating engine
● It is easy to learn
● In general, other frameworks offer more features
● It is not a widely used framework
- Nuxt JS
Nuxt is a front-end FM that is developed using Vue JS. Though recently, several websites and trademarks are proactively adopting this to make their website application.
● Offers exceptional SEO improvements
● Created using a robust modular architecture. There are longer than 50 modules to pick from
● Server-side rendered
● Supports static website generation
● Capability to create customized social sharing windows for users
● Can create universal apps
● Automatic code splitting
● Most common plugins are not available
● Cannot effectively handle high traffic
● It does not work particularly well with other custom libraries
Created in collaboration with Facebook, Jest has gained popularity with developers over a short time. The main reason for this is the simplicity Jest provides. It’s simple to comprehend, and developers can quickly begin using it after a brief introduction to the program.
● You can begin writing tests immediately with the jest package, which comprises several modules.
● It also offers cross-browser compatibility to help you test your software.
● Jest Framework is extremely fast. If your system performs well, it executes your test cases quickly and efficiently.
● Every jest test runs within its sandbox. This ensures that there are no interfering tests or that the execution of other tests is not affected.
● You can use it for snapshot testing, which is very useful. You can capture the string representing your provided or given component and save it to a file.
● Officially supported by React developer community
● Support for asynchronous testing of code
● Support for testing visual regressions
● The minimum setup and configuration requirements are minimal.
● Well-maintained and well documented
● Slow performance because of auto-mocking
● Need to utilize jasmine for efficient execution
● Snapshot testing is not practical.
● The absence of libraries and tools when compared with other testing frameworks
Answer: You must choose the right one before your team starts the development process. If you practice a chance FWK, possibilities are you will get lost halfway through and may want to start from scratch.
Q10: How to choose a JS framework?
Answer: Start by holding a brainstorming sitting and recognizing the requirements of your team. What sort of characteristics will you need, and how scalable should the work be?
Analyze the pros and cons and the features of each of the FMs as mentioned earlier and then choose one of them.
Q 15: Which JS framework is popular?
Q 18: Which JS framework is best for 2023?
Other most popular frameworks are React, Node.js, Ember.js, and Vue.js
Consider where you intend to use the framework. Before choosing a development tool, you should consider the design and features of your app. Then, learn more about the framework’s features and complexities.